Stonkote ESD

Coatings & Sealers

Environmental Impact

Production Carbon

6.33

kgCO₂e per 1 m^2

Declared Unit

1 m^2

Valid Until

Feb 2030

Third-Party Verified

Yes

Product Details

Category

Coatings & Sealers

Plant Geography

IT

Masterformat

09 60 00 Flooring

Mass per Declared Unit

1 kg

Program Operator

Smart EPD LLC

Verifier

Ranjani Theregowda (Smart EPD LLC)

PCR

Construction Products 1.3.4

Plant Address

07041 Alghero, Province of Sassari, Italy

Manufacturer Website
www.stonhard.com
Date of Issue

2025-02-13

Description

Two-component epoxy coating for areas requiring electrostatic discharge (ESD) properties. Improves cleanability and controls static charge generation.

Lifecycle Breakdown

Method: EF 3.1 · 6.33 kgCO₂e/kg

EPD PDF Document

Program Operator: Smart EPD®www.smartepd.comEnvironmental Product DeclarationIN ACCORDANCE WITH ISO 14025 AND EN 15804:A2:2019/AC:2021SmartEPD-2025-044-0318-01Stonkote ESDDate of IssueFeb 13, 2025Expiration dateFeb 13, 2030Last updatedFeb 13, 2025Refer to the EPD Library at www.smartepd.com for the latest EPD listing information
Stonkote ESDStonhardGeneral Information Stonhard 1000 E. Park Ave., Maple Shade, NJ 08052800.257.7953info@stonhard.comstonhard.comProduct Name:Stonkote ESDDeclared Unit:1 kg Declaration Number:SmartEPD-2025-044-0318-01Date of Issue:February 13, 2025Expiration:February 13, 2030Last updated:February 13, 2025EPD Scope:Cradle to gate with other optionsA1 - A3, A4, A5, C1-C4, D Market(s) of Applicability:EuropeGeneral Organization InformationStonhard is committed to manufacturing and installing quality, seamless products that protect, maintain and enhance industrial and commercial environments. We maintain a global leadership position in the marketplace with the support of those who stand behind the Stonhard name, and who passionately believe that success happens because of the people who make it happen.Further information can be found at:www.stonhard.comLimitations, Liability, and OwnershipEnvironmental declarations from different programs (ISO 14025) may not be comparable. Comparison of the environmental performance of products using EPD information shall be based on the product’s use and impacts at the building level, and therefore EPDs may not be used for comparability purposes when not considering the whole building life cycle. EPD comparability is only possible when all stages of a life cycle have been considered. However, variations and deviations are possible. Example of variations: Different LCA software and background LCI datasets may lead to differences results for upstream or downstream of the life cycle stages declared. The EPD owner has sole ownership, liability, and responsibility for the EPD.Reference StandardsStandard(s):ISO 14025 and ISO 21930:2017Core PCR:EPD International PCR for Construction Products 2019:14 (EN 15804:A2:2019/AC:2021) v1.3.4Date of issue: April 30, 2024Valid until: June 20, 2025Page 2 / 13
Stonkote ESDStonhardSub-category PCR review panel:Contact Smart EPD for more information.General Program Instructions:Smart EPD General Program Instructions v.1.0, November 2022Verification InformationLCA Author/Creator:Juan David Villegasjuan@parqhq.comEPD Program Operator:Smart EPDinfo@smartepd.comwww.smartepd.com585 Grove St., Ste. 145 PMB 966, Herndon, VA 20170, USAVerification:Independent critical review of the LCA and data, according to ISO 14044 and ISO 14071:ExternalRanjani TheregowdaSmart EPD LLCranjani.theregowda@smartepd.comIndependent external verification of EPD, according to ISO 14025 and reference PCR(s):ExternalRanjani TheregowdaSmart EPD LLCranjani.theregowda@smartepd.comProduct InformationDeclared Unit:1 kg Mass:1 kgProduct Specificity:Product AverageProduct SpecificProduct DescriptionStonkote ESD is a two-component, epoxy coating designed and suitable for areas requiring electrostatic discharge (ESD) properties. It is formulated to improve cleanability and control static charge generation. Stonkote ESD is easily applied and hardens to an attractive gloss finish.Further information can be found at:https://www.stonhard.com/products/complementary-products/resin-floor-coatings/Product SpecificationsProduct SKU(s):3344A,36484B1Product Classification Codes:EC3 - Finishes -> Flooring -> OtherFlooringPage 3 / 13
Stonkote ESDStonhardMaterial CompositionMaterial/Component CategoryOrigin% MassCuring agentDEU20 - 40%Epoxy resinNLD,ITA,USA50 - 70%DefoamerDEU<10%Surface additiveDEU<10%Filler, extenderITA<10%SolventITA<10%PigmentDEU<10%Biogenic Carbon Contentkg C per kgBiogenic carbon content in productNoneBiogenic carbon content in accompanying packaging0.024Hazardous Materials1,2-Ethanediamine, N-(2-aminoethyl)-, reaction products with glycidyl tolyl ether (84144-79-6)1,6 hexanediol glycidyl ether (16096-31-4)2-Propenenitrile, reaction products with ethylenediamine, hydrogenated, reaction products with benzalde-hyde, diethylenetriam ine and triethylenetetram ine, hydrogenated (1173092-74-4)3-aminopropyldiethylamine (104-78-9)4-chloro-trifluoromethylbenzene (98-56-6)Benzyl alcohol (100-51-6)diethylenetriamine (111-40-0)Epoxy resin based on bisphenol F (9003-36-5)Reaction product: bisphenol-A-(epichlorhydrin) epoxy resin (25068-38-6)Siloxanes and Silicones, di-Me, reaction products with silica (67762-90-7)titanium dioxide (13463-67-7)Page 4 / 13
Stonkote ESDStonhardEPD Data SpecificityPrimary Data Year:2023-2024Manufacturing Specificity:Industry AverageManufacturer AverageFacility SpecificAveraging:Averaging was not conducted for this EPDSystem BoundaryProductionA1Raw material supplyA2TransportA3ManufacturingConstructionA4Transport to siteA5Assembly / InstallUseB1UseNDB2MaintenanceNDB3RepairNDB4ReplacementNDB5RefurbishmentNDB6Operational Energy UseNDB7Operational Water UseNDEnd of LifeC1DeconstructionC2TransportC3Waste ProcessingC4DisposalBenefits & Loads Beyond System BoundaryDRecycling, Reuse Recovery PotentialPage 5 / 13
Stonkote ESDStonhardPlantsAlghero, ItalyAlghero, Province of Sassari, ItalyProduct Flow DiagramPage 6 / 13
Stonkote ESDStonhardSoftware and DatabaseLCA Software:SimaPro v. 9.5LCI Foreground Database(s):Ecoinvent v. 3.9.1LCI Background Database(s):Ecoinvent v. 3.9.1Data QualityThe quality of inventory data is evaluated based on several criteria, including precision, completeness, consistency, and representativeness.Precision and Completeness• Precision: The inventory data used in this study were either directly measured, calculated, or estimated based on primary data sources, ensuring high precision. Background data from ecoinvent v3.9.1 database also has documented precision to the extent available.• Completeness: The product system's mass balance and inventory completeness were thoroughly checked. Some exclusions were made in line with the PCR requirements, such as personnel impacts, R&D activities, business travel, secondary packaging, point of sale infrastructure, and the coating applicator. However, no data was intentionally omitted..Consistency and Reproducibility• Consistency: Primary data were collected with a similar level of detail, while background data came from the ecoinvent v3.9.1 database. The modeling approach and other methodological choices were applied consistently throughout the model. Default values from the PCR were considered where there was unavailability of primary data, For example, the default waste transport distance was used for product disposal assessment.• Reproducibility: This study ensures reproducibility by providing comprehensive disclosure of input-output data, dataset choices, and modeling approaches. A knowledgeable third party should be able to approximate the results using the same data and modeling methods.Representativeness• Temporal: Primary data were collected for the 12 month period starting June 2023 and ending in May 2024 to ensure the representativeness of post-consumer content. Secondary data from the ecoinvent v3 database is typically representative of recent years. to ensure the representativeness of post-consumer content. Secondary data from the ecoinvent v3 database is typically representative of recent years.• Geographical: Primary data represent Stonhard's production facilities. Where applicable, differences in electric grid mix were considered using appropriate secondary data. The use of country-specific data ensures high geographical representativeness, and proxy data were only used when country-specific data were unavailable.• Technological: Both primary and secondary data were tailored to the specific technologies studied, ensuring high technological representativeness.Life Cycle Module DescriptionsPrimary data were collected for the 12 month period starting June 2023 and ending May 2024 to ensure technical, geographical and temporal the representativeness. The manufacturing process entails the addition of pre-weighted ingredients, followed by mixing in the correct sequence to create the desired products. Subsequently, packages and distributes the finished products to various distribution centers. The process involves the use of grid electricity, energy from natural diesel combustion, an process water. Non hazardous waste consisting mainly of packaging material is sent to disposal or recycling.LCA DiscussionPage 7 / 13
Stonkote ESDStonhardAllocation ProcedureAllocation of co-products was avoided, to the extent it was possible, based on the guidance given in ISO 14044:2006, 4.3., in EN 15804+A2:2019 and section 4.5.1 of Construction Products PCR 2019:14 version 1.3.4. Mass allocation was applied to energy and water use at the facility level. Waste allocation followed the polluter pays principle as indicated in section 4.5.2 of the PCR. Total product mass produced at each facility was provided.Cut-off ProcedureNo cut-off criteria are defined for this study. The system boundary was defined based on relevance to the goal of the study. For the processes within the system boundary, all available energy and material flow data have been included in the model. In cases where no matching life cycle inventories are available to represent a flow, proxy data have been applied based on conservative assumptions regarding environmental impacts.Renewable ElectricityEnergy Attribute Certificates (EACs) such as Re-newable Energy Certificates (RECs) or Power Pur-chase Agreements (PPAs) are included in the baseline reported results:NoScenariosTransport to the building/construction site (A4)A4 ModuleFuel Type:DieselVehicle Type:Truck and TrailerTransport Distance:1.118e+03 kmCapacity Utilization:33 %Packaging Mass:8.293e-02 kgGross density of products transported:1.220e+03 kg/m3Weight of products transported:1.000e+00 kgVolume of products transported:8.197e-04 m3Capacity utilization volume factor:1Assumptions for scenario development:Transport distance includes finished product to distribution center and distribution center to point of sale.Installation in to the building/construction site (A5)A5 ModuleProduct Lost per Functional Unit:0.1 kgMass of Packaging Waste Specified by Type:0.08293 kgVOC Emissions:69000000000 ug/m3Assumptions for scenario development: Page 8 / 13
Stonkote ESDStonhardVOC Assumptions:The VOC content reported in this EPD is a conservative estimated value and may not accurately represent the actual VOC emissions during the coating's curing process after installation. It is provided for informational purposes only and should not be used as a direct indicator of emissions under actual use conditionsEnd of Life (C1 - C4)C1 - C4 ModulesCollection ProcessCollected with Mixed Construction Waste:1 kgRecoveryLandfill:1 kgResultsEnvironmental Impact Assessment ResultsEF 3.1per 1 kg of product .LCIA results are relative expressions and do not predict impacts on category endpoints, the exceeding of thresholds, safety margins or risks.BaselineImpact CategoryMethodUnitA1A2A3A4A5C1C2C3C4DGWP-totalEF 3.1kg CO2e6.33e+02.95e-11.21e-109.44e-305.96e-30GWP-biogenicEF 3.1kg CO2 eq-4.76e-22.17e-44.28e-303.18e-603.41e-60GWP-fossilEF 3.1kg CO2 eq6.37e+02.94e-11.17e-109.43e-305.95e-30GWP-lulucEF 3.1kg CO2 eq6.00e-31.37e-42.91e-404.86e-603.60e-60ODPEF 3.1kg CFC11 eq2.24e-56.34e-92.10e-901.42e-1001.73e-100APEF 3.1kg SO2 eq3.92e-21.20e-35.88e-405.57e-504.49e-50EP-freshwaterEF 3.1kg N eq1.84e-31.99e-51.06e-407.67e-704.96e-70EP-marineEF 3.1kg N eq7.60e-33.82e-41.06e-402.27e-501.72e-50EP-terrestrialEF 3.1kg N eq8.21e-24.07e-39.37e-402.45e-401.85e-40POCPEF 3.1kg O3 eq2.74e-21.56e-33.03e-407.68e-506.43e-50ADP-minerals&metalsEF 3.1kg Sb eq5.53e-59.15e-72.32e-703.01e-808.27e-90ADP-fossilEF 3.1MJ1.09e+24.12e+02.69e+001.34e-101.48e-10WDPEF 3.1m3 world eq4.81e+01.54e-22.83e-205.89e-406.56e-30Note:Not all abbreviated indicators listed below may be present in the results above. The inclusion of indicators varies based on PCR requirements.Abbreviations:GWP = Global Warming Potential, 100 years (may also be denoted as GWP-total, GWP-fossil (fossil fuels), GWP-biogenic (biogenic sources), GWP-luluc (land use and land use change)), ODP = Ozone Depletion Potential, AP = Acidification Potential, EP = Eutrophication Potential, SFP = Smog Formation Potential, POCP = Photochemical oxidant creation potential, ADP-Fossil = Abiotic depletion potential for fossil resources, ADP-Minerals&Metals = Abiotic depletion potential for non-fossil resources, WDP = Water deprivation potential, PM = Particular Matter Emissions, IRP = Ionizing radiation, human health, ETP-fw = Eco-toxicity (freshwater), HTP-c = Human toxicity (cancer), HTP-nc = Human toxicity (non-cancer), SQP = Soil quality index.Comparisons cannot be made between product-specific or industry average EPDs at the design stage of a project, before a building has been specified. Comparisons may be made between product-specific or industry average EPDs at the time of product purchase when product performance and specifications have been established and serve as a functional unit for comparison. Environmental impact results shall be converted to a functional unit basis before any comparison is attempted. Any comparison of EPDs shall be subject to the requirements of ISO 21930 or EN 15804. EPDs are not comparative assertions and are either not comparable or have limited comparability when they have different system boundaries. EPDs are not comparative assertions and are either not comparable or have limited comparability when they have different system boundaries, are based on different product category rules or are missing relevant environmental impacts. Such comparison can be inaccurate, and could lead to erroneous selection of materials or products which are higher-impact, at least in some impact categories.Page 9 / 13
Stonkote ESDStonhardResource Use Indicatorsper 1 kg of product .BaselineIndicatorUnitA1A2A3A4A5C1C2C3C4DPEREMJ6.87e+07.05e-25.13e-101.69e-301.26e-30PERMMJ00000000PERTMJ6.87e+07.05e-25.13e-101.69e-301.26e-30PENREMJ1.09e+24.12e+02.69e+001.34e-101.48e-10PENRMMJ1.21e-22.72e-44.37e-301.92e-602.30e-60PENRTMJ1.09e+24.12e+02.69e+001.34e-101.48e-10SMkg00000000RSFMJ00000000NRSFMJ00000000FWm31.20e-15.01e-42.10e-301.51e-501.53e-40Note:Not all abbreviated indicators listed below may be present in the results above. The inclusion of indicators varies based on PCR requirements.Abbreviations:RPRE or PERE = Renewable primary resources used as energy carrier (fuel), RPRM or PERM = Renewable primary resources with energy content used as material, RPRT or PERT = Total use of renewable primary resources with energy content, NRPRE or PENRE = Non-renewable primary resources used as an energy carrier (fuel), NRPRM or PENRM = Non-renewable primary resources with energy content used as material, NRPRT or PENRT = Total non-renewable primary resources with energy content, SM = Secondary materials, RSF = Renewable secondary fuels, NRSF = Non-renewable secondary fuels, RE = Recovered energy, ADPF = Abiotic depletion potential, FW = Use of net freshwater resources, VOCs = Volatile Organic Compounds.Waste and Output Flow Indicatorsper 1 kg of product .BaselineIndicatorUnitA1A2A3A4A5C1C2C3C4DHWDkg5.72e-19.31e-58.38e-503.33e-601.83e-60NHWDkg1.46e+01.65e-11.10e-106.42e-309.80e-10RWDkg6.66e-51.60e-61.94e-502.69e-802.19e-80CRUkg00000000MFRkg00000000MERkg00000000Note:Not all abbreviated indicators listed below may be present in the results above. The inclusion of indicators varies based on PCR requirements.Abbreviations:HWD = Hazardous waste disposed, NHWD = Non-hazardous waste disposed, RWD = Radioactive waste disposed, HLRW = High-level radioactive waste, ILLRW = Intermediate- and low-level radioactive waste, CRU = Components for re-use, MFR or MR = Materials for recycling, MER = Materials for energy recovery, MNER = Materials for incineration, no energy recovery, EE or EEE = Recovered energy exported from the product system, EET = Exported thermal energy.Page 10 / 13
Stonkote ESDStonhardCarbon Emissions and Removalsper 1 kg of product .TechIndicatorUnitA1A2A3A5C4DBCRPkg CO2000NDBCEPkg CO2000NDBCRKkg CO28.73e-200NDBCEKkg CO20-8.73e-20NDBCEWkg CO2000NDCCEkg CO2000NDCCRkg CO2000NDCWNRkg CO2000NDNote:Not all abbreviated indicators listed below may be present in the results above. The inclusion of indicators varies based on PCR requirements.Abbreviations:BCRP = Biogenic Carbon Removal from Product, BCEP = Biogenic Carbon Emission from Product, BCRK = Biogenic Carbon Removal from Packaging, BCEK = Biogenic Carbon Emission from Packaging, BCEW = Biogenic Carbon Emission from Combustion of Waste from Renewable Sources Used in Production Processes, CCE = Calcination Carbon Emissions, CCR = Carbonation Carbon Removals, CWNR = Carbon Emissions from Combustion of Waste from Non-Renewable Sources used in Production Processes, GWP-luc = Carbon Emissions from Land-use Change. Page 11 / 13
Stonkote ESDStonhardInterpretation• The manufacturing of the products in this analysis involves the direct procurement of raw materials from suppliers. These materials are then transported to manufacturing facilities in Europe where they are stored and mixed to produce the coatings. Notably, the product stage (stage 1) has the highest impact contribution, mainly attributed to the combined environmental impacts associated with raw material manufacturing and energy used in manufacturing.• For products with significant manufacturing energy impacts, the shift to renewable energy sources is recommended.• Given that the raw materials used in product manufacturing have a significant impact, exploration of opportunities to substitute these materials with alternatives that have a lower environmental impact. Additionally, consideration should be given to collaborating with suppliers who employ sustainable manufacturing techniques or integrate more renewable energy into their production processes. Such initiatives can lead to more environmentally friendly products and further enhance the sustainability of the products in this analysis.0%20%40%60%80%100%GWP-totalGWP-biogenicGWP-fossilGWP-lulucODPAPEP-freshwaterEP-marineEP-terrestrialPOCPADP-minerals&metalsADP-fossilWDPProduction (A1 - A3)Construction (A4 - A5)End of Life (C1 - C4)Additional Environmental InformationBefore using this product, it is recommended that the operator read and follow all caution statements on the product data sheet and on the SDS for this product, and personal protective equipment must be used as directed.Page 12 / 13
Stonkote ESDStonhardOther Environmental ImpactsImpact CategoryIndicatorUnitA1A2A3A4A5C1C2C3C4DPMNDDisease inci-dence4.46e-71.97e-82.10e-901.01e-909.83e-100IRPNDkBq U235 eq2.64e-16.51e-37.59e-201.13e-409.40e-50ETP-fwioNDCTUe5.97e+12.01e+02.97e-107.19e-206.56e-20ETP-fwoNDCTUe3.40e+17.30e-24.39e-202.65e-304.02e-30SQPNDPt2.68e+12.06e+04.35e-107.91e-202.95e-10HTPcNDCTUh1.61e-81.23e-103.67e-1106.24e-1202.54e-120HTPcioNDCTUh2.18e-96.26e-111.98e-1102.08e-1201.16e-120HTPcoNDCTUh1.39e-86.06e-111.68e-1104.16e-1201.38e-120HTPncNDCTUh7.86e-82.69e-91.02e-901.18e-1003.17e-110HTPncioNDCTUh7.37e-82.53e-99.91e-1008.99e-1102.86e-110HTPncoNDCTUh4.92e-91.63e-102.62e-1102.83e-1103.15e-120GWP-GWGNDkg CO2e6.38e+02.95e-11.17e-109.43e-305.96e-30Note:Not all abbreviated indicators listed below may be present in the results above. The inclusion of indicators varies based on PCR requirements.Abbreviations:GWP-IOBC/GWP-GHG = Climate change indicator with instantanious oxidation of biogenic carbon. The GWP-IOBC indicator has zero contribution to GWP from biogenic carbon temporary stored in products and packaging. The GWP-IOBC indicator, also called GWP-GHG, is identical to GWP-total except that the characterization factor (CF) for biogenic CO2 is set to zero.References• ISO 14044, “Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirements and guidelines”, ISO14044:2006.• ISO 21930, “Sustainability in buildings and civil engineering worksCore rules for environmental product declarations of construction products and services”, ISO 21930:2017.• NSF International, Product Category Rule for Environmental Product Declarations for Resinous Floor Coatings, December 2018.• Bare, J. 2014. Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Environmental Impacts (TRACI) TRACI version 2.1 User’s Guide. US EPA Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-12/554, http://nepis.epa.gov/Adobe/PDF/P100HN53.pdf• ISO 14025, “Environmental labels and declarations, Type III environmental declarations, Principles and procedures”, ISO14025:2006• US Environmental Protection Agency. Waste Reduction Model (WARM). https://www3.epa.gov/epawaste/conserve/tools/warm/SWMGHGreport.html• Ryberg, M., Vieira, M.D.M., Zgola, M. et al. (2014). ‘Updated US and Canadian normalization factors for TRACI 2.1.’ Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 16: 329. doi:10.1007/s10098-013-0629-z• IPCC, 2013: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp, doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324• Ecoinvent v3.9.1, December 2022. The ecoinvent database: Overview and methodology, Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3, www.ecoin-vent.orgPage 13 / 13